<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Google Reader Features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sparxmind.com/new-google-reader-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sparxmind.com/new-google-reader-features/</link>
	<description>Escaping Thoughts - Posted Daily</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: spudart</title>
		<link>http://sparxmind.com/new-google-reader-features/#comment-2364</link>
		<dc:creator>spudart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 05:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sparxmind.com/?p=279#comment-2364</guid>
		<description>bookmarks should be not meant for google reader. you could only bookmark pages that are part of a site with an RSS feed. What if a site doesn't have an RSS feed? bah. I refuse to bookmark in google reader. Long live having all my bookmarks in one spot! I DO NOT STAND FOR THE SEPARATION OF BOOKMARKS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bookmarks should be not meant for google reader. you could only bookmark pages that are part of a site with an RSS feed. What if a site doesn&#039;t have an RSS feed? bah. I refuse to bookmark in google reader. Long live having all my bookmarks in one spot! I DO NOT STAND FOR THE SEPARATION OF BOOKMARKS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.832 seconds -->
